ferrosoho.blogg.se - Sheepshaver linux

Sheepshaver linux how to#
Sheepshaver linux mac os x#
Sheepshaver linux mac os#
Sheepshaver linux driver#
Sheepshaver linux mac#

SheepShaver started on BeOS and the PowerPC-based BeBox as a commercial product and pun on the Amiga 68K Mac emulator ShapeShifter it only runs the classic Mac OS, and only then up to 9.0.4 (later versions require an MMU, which SheepShaver doesn't implement).

Sheepshaver linux mac os#

This is relevant because of the current state of Mac emulation: in general, the classic Mac OS is better supported than Mac OS X.

Sheepshaver linux mac os x#

Even my G5 only ever ran Mac OS X Tiger so that I still could run Classic applications (on top of the fact I preferred Tiger's interface to Leopard). With the exception of the G5 all of these systems natively ran the classic Mac OS, so I had a large investment in classic Mac software. I upgraded from there to (briefly) a used Power Mac 7200, then traded it in for a used Power Mac 7300, then pimped that out, then a Power Mac G4 MDD, the first computer I personally bought new, and then the G5. I first touched a Mac in 1987 (it was my buddy's father's Mac Plus, and we spent hours messing around in HyperCard and System 6), though the first Mac I personally owned was a second-hand Macintosh IIsi.

Sheepshaver linux driver#

I certainly was, even granting it made commercial sense at the time, and I ended up using a Power Mac G5 Quad for 13 years as a daily driver before I got the Raptor Talos II I use now.

Keeping this in mind will greatly increase your chances of getting a useful answer.I've always maintained (possibly by personal experience) that one of the natural future markets for OpenPOWER is one of the architecture's past markets: Power Mac users, particularly those who were irked by the Intel transition. Some general advice about asking technical support questions can be found at There is also a mailing list for Basilisk II users:Īnd another mailing list for Basilisk II developers: If you have problems, you may want to visit the Basilisk II forums: The Basilisk II project page on SourceForge is at There is no point in sending questions about ROM files and how/where to get them. I also strongly suggest reading this before posting a bug report: You found a bug? Well, open an issue in this repo, supplying as much information as possible (operating system and versions of Basilisk II and MacOS being used, relevant hardware information, the exact steps to reproduce the bug, etc.)

Open BasiliskII/src/MacOSX/BasiliskII.xcodeproj.

More generally, here are the steps: BasiliskII macOS travis.yml and appveyor.yml contain the build scripts for CI. These builds need the SDL2 framework/library to be installed. These are the only architectures that will be maintained, unless other CI services for other architectures can be added. To date, the following architectures are functioning with a bare minimum of continuous integration testing.

Sheepshaver linux how to#

if we can't make informed decisions about accepting patches, the project can't evolve from open-source contributionsĪs such, be prepared to offer tests (or guidance on how to perform automated testing) on any contributions.

if we can't provide continuous integration of pull requests, we can't make informed decisions about accepting patches.

if testing requires the use of antique hardware or usage of bespoke 3rd-party testing services for old architectures, we can't provide continuous integration of pull requests.

It is the opinion of this maintiner that such a situation is an existential threat to the future of the project as a whole:

Many of the architectures on which this codebase originally ran are no longer in production, and several are not readily testable with modern distributed CI/CD services. The cxmon project has been split from this repository. It is an attempt to centralize the individual development efforts that have gone on in the absence of the original cebix/macemu repository owner. This repository contains the BasiliskII and SheepShaver projects.